Website works in test mode - Old version
Hotline 15 20 Hotline 15 20 Hotline 15 20
CASE OF "GEORGIA CAPITAL" AND "BUCKSWOOD SCHOOL"
2019-07-25

Competition Agency of Georgia received an application regarding the planned concentration as a result of acquisition of 80% share of “BUCKSWOOD INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL – TBILISI” by “GEORGIA CAPITAL.” The Agency defined service of general education offered by private schools as a product market. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment.

View the document
CASE OF "GEORGIA CAPITAL", "BRITISH-GEORGIAN ACADEMY" AND "BRITISH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL"
2019-06-19

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between “GEORGIA CAPITAL,”  “BRITISH_GEORGIAN ACADEMY,” and “BRITISH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF TBILISI” as a result of acquisition of 70% share of “BRITISH-GEORGIAN ACADEMY” by “GEORGIA CAPITAL.” The Agency defined service of general education offered by private schools as a product market. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment. 

View the document
CASE OF "GEORGIA CAPITAL" AND "MOTORSTAR"
2019-06-13

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between “GEORGIA CAPITAL” and “MOTORSTAR” as a result of acquisition of 80% share of  “BRITISH-GEORGIAN ACADEMY” by “GEORGIA CAPITAL.” The relevant production market was defined by the Agency as the product markets of auto transport repair (service) and auto parts, which, in turn, were divided into the market levels of auto parts import, auto parts wholesale trade and auto parts retail sale, as well as auto transport repair and service. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment. 

View the document
CASE OF "AMERITECH" AND "SMILEY"
2018-07-06

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between  “AMERITECH,” “SMILEY” as a result of establishing a joint venture. The Agency analyzed markets of computers, mobile devices, domestic appliances; relevant undertakings and their market shares; factors of market environment. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment

View the document
CASE OF "MEDCAPITAL" AND "MEDISON HOLDING"
2018-06-08

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between  “MEDCAPITAL” and “MEDISON HOLDING” as a result of acquisition of 100% share of  “MEDISON HOLDING” by  “MEDCAPITAL.” The Agency defined service of ambulatory as a product/service market; analyzed information on the relevant undertakings and their market shares; factors of market environment. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment.

View the document
CASE OF "ALTA" AND "METROMART"
2017-12-04

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between “ALTA” and  “METROMART” as a result of acquisition of 50% share of “METROMART” by  “ALTA.” The Agency analyzed import and retail market of electronics, markets of service and repair of domestic appliances and communication devices; information on the relevant undertakings and their market shares; factors of market environment. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment.

View the document
CASE OF "CEMENT INVEST BV" AND "HEIDELBERG CEMENT"
2017-10-06

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between Netherlands based company - “CEMENT INVEST BV”- and Svetlana Lambrianova, and Netherlands based company - “HEIDELBERG CEMENT CENTRAL EUROPE EAST HOLDING BV” -and Robert Bejuashvili. As a result of detailed analysis of the relevant market and evaluation of potential impact of concentration, the Agency considered the concentration as compatible to the competitive environment. 

View the document
CASE OF "GPC" AND "ABC PHARMACY"
2016-12-28

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned  concentration between “GPC” and  “A-B-C PHARMACY” as a result of acquisition of 100% share of “A-B-C PHARMACY” by “GPC.” The Agency defined pharmaceutical products as a relevant market. The Agency analyzed information on the relevant undertakings and their market shares; factors of market environment. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment. 

View the document
CASE OF "HEALTHCARE GROUP" AND "GPC"
2016-04-28

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between “GEORGIA HEALTHCARE GROUP” and “GPC” as a result of acquisition of 100% share of  “GPC” by  “GEORGIA HEALTHCARE GROUP.” The Agency defined pharmaceutical products, and ambulatory, stationary, and health insurance services as relevant markets. On the basis of analysis of market environment factors, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment. 

View the document
CASE OF "ALTA" AND "EUROTECHNICS"
2016-03-07

Competition Agency of Georgia received a notification of the planned concentration between “ALTA,” “EUROTECHNICS GEORGIA” as a result of establishing a joint venture. The Agency analyzed markets of computers, mobile devices, domestic appliances; relevant undertakings and their market shares; factors of market environment. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment. The Agency defined computer and mobile devices, domestic appliances, and electronics installation services as relevant markets. According to the decision of the Agency, the concentration was considered as compatible to the competitive environment.

View the document